https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118017 The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 by the Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore, on the appellant. The Tribunal found the appellant's involvement in fraudulent activities evident from statements and actions in the case records, despite the absence of a confiscation order. Emphasizing the interconnected nature of proceedings and the appellant's role in the scheme, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty was justified based on the evidence presented. The appellant's appeal was rejected, and the penalty imposition was affirmed on 10-4-2006. en-us Mon, 10 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:13:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118017 The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 by the Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore, on the appellant. The Tribunal found the appellant's involvement in fraudulent activities evident from statements and actions in the case records, despite the absence of a confiscation order. Emphasizing the interconnected nature of proceedings and the appellant's role in the scheme, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty was justified based on the evidence presented. The appellant's appeal was rejected, and the penalty imposition was affirmed on 10-4-2006. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 10 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118017