<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 639 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118001</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that income from share transactions should be classified as capital gains rather than business income, based on factors like holding period and funding sources. The AO was instructed to allow the assessee to present documents for interest deductions and verify brokerage payments for potential reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2024 13:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 639 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118001</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that income from share transactions should be classified as capital gains rather than business income, based on factors like holding period and funding sources. The AO was instructed to allow the assessee to present documents for interest deductions and verify brokerage payments for potential reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>