<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 499 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117998</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders of confiscation and penalty under Sections 111(d) and 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962, emphasizing strict interpretation of penal provisions and the invalidity of actions based on expired notifications. The appeal was disposed of, with the duty liability not being contested.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:25:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 499 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117998</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders of confiscation and penalty under Sections 111(d) and 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962, emphasizing strict interpretation of penal provisions and the invalidity of actions based on expired notifications. The appeal was disposed of, with the duty liability not being contested.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>