<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 633 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117979</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation and comprehensive review of the evidence and material presented. The Tribunal found that the statements made before the Police Department were not voluntary, raising doubts about the alleged on-money received on the sale of the bungalow. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was overturned, directing a fair reassessment with all relevant material provided to the assessee for review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:28:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 633 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117979</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation and comprehensive review of the evidence and material presented. The Tribunal found that the statements made before the Police Department were not voluntary, raising doubts about the alleged on-money received on the sale of the bungalow. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was overturned, directing a fair reassessment with all relevant material provided to the assessee for review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>