<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 485 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117978</link>
    <description>Extended limitation could not be invoked for a departmental demand arising from an alleged short levy due to reclassification of Polyester Texturised Yarn, because the assessee had timely filed the classification list and RT-12 returns and the department was already aware of the relevant budget changes. In the absence of allegations supporting invocation of the extended period, the demand was held to be time-barred and the lower authority&#039;s order was upheld. The departmental challenge therefore failed on limitation, and the demand remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:34:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 485 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117978</link>
      <description>Extended limitation could not be invoked for a departmental demand arising from an alleged short levy due to reclassification of Polyester Texturised Yarn, because the assessee had timely filed the classification list and RT-12 returns and the department was already aware of the relevant budget changes. In the absence of allegations supporting invocation of the extended period, the demand was held to be time-barred and the lower authority&#039;s order was upheld. The departmental challenge therefore failed on limitation, and the demand remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>