<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 479 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117969</link>
    <description>Confiscation of imported goods could not be sustained where a full Customs examination found no arms, ammunition or other prohibited articles in the consignment, so the statutory basis for action under the Customs Act was absent. Because the penalty was consequential to the confiscation, it also could not survive once confiscation failed. The appeal therefore succeeded and both confiscation and penalty were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:14:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 479 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117969</link>
      <description>Confiscation of imported goods could not be sustained where a full Customs examination found no arms, ammunition or other prohibited articles in the consignment, so the statutory basis for action under the Customs Act was absent. Because the penalty was consequential to the confiscation, it also could not survive once confiscation failed. The appeal therefore succeeded and both confiscation and penalty were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>