<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 629 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117964</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the secret commission paid by the assessee was not deductible as business expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish that the expenditure was wholly and exclusively for business purposes. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to disallow the entire expenditure claimed by the assessee on account of secret commission, modifying its earlier decision and allowing the departmental appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:05:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 629 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117964</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the secret commission paid by the assessee was not deductible as business expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish that the expenditure was wholly and exclusively for business purposes. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to disallow the entire expenditure claimed by the assessee on account of secret commission, modifying its earlier decision and allowing the departmental appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>