<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 472 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117958</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, holding MMTC liable for the customs duty on the gold loaned to BRGL due to the failure to fulfill the export obligation. The bond executed by MMTC under Notification No. 177/94-Cus. was deemed valid and enforceable, and MMTC&#039;s liability under Section 59(3) of the Customs Act remained. The Commissioner&#039;s calculation of customs duty at Rs. 84,18,550/- was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:46:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 472 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117958</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, holding MMTC liable for the customs duty on the gold loaned to BRGL due to the failure to fulfill the export obligation. The bond executed by MMTC under Notification No. 177/94-Cus. was deemed valid and enforceable, and MMTC&#039;s liability under Section 59(3) of the Customs Act remained. The Commissioner&#039;s calculation of customs duty at Rs. 84,18,550/- was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>