<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 467 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117952</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI set aside the confiscation of 117 MTs. of ferro silicon and the penalty imposed on the Director of the manufacturing company for non-entry in the RG-1 register. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that goods cannot be confiscated solely for failure to enter them in the production record, especially when a valid explanation exists. The decision underscored the need to consider all relevant factors and explanations before imposing penalties or confiscating goods for procedural non-compliances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:39:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 467 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117952</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI set aside the confiscation of 117 MTs. of ferro silicon and the penalty imposed on the Director of the manufacturing company for non-entry in the RG-1 register. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that goods cannot be confiscated solely for failure to enter them in the production record, especially when a valid explanation exists. The decision underscored the need to consider all relevant factors and explanations before imposing penalties or confiscating goods for procedural non-compliances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>