<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 622 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117947</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039; findings, dismissing the appeal. Mrs. Sudha Tiwari&#039;s salary increase was deemed unreasonable, breaching Section 13(1)(c) and disqualifying exemption under Section 11. The Tribunal affirmed the income computation under Section 28 and upheld the interest levy under Section 234B. Mrs. Tiwari&#039;s influence in the organization and disproportionate salary growth were key factors in the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:26:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 622 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117947</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039; findings, dismissing the appeal. Mrs. Sudha Tiwari&#039;s salary increase was deemed unreasonable, breaching Section 13(1)(c) and disqualifying exemption under Section 11. The Tribunal affirmed the income computation under Section 28 and upheld the interest levy under Section 234B. Mrs. Tiwari&#039;s influence in the organization and disproportionate salary growth were key factors in the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>