<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 592 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117939</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the sale transactions of shares were non-genuine and aimed at reducing tax liability. The claimed loss of Rs. 45,50,000 was deemed non-genuine and disallowed. The transactions were considered sham and illusory, emphasizing the need to scrutinize surrounding circumstances to prevent tax evasion through colourable devices. The revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, highlighting the importance of upholding the authenticity of transactions to deter tax avoidance practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:02:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 592 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117939</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the sale transactions of shares were non-genuine and aimed at reducing tax liability. The claimed loss of Rs. 45,50,000 was deemed non-genuine and disallowed. The transactions were considered sham and illusory, emphasizing the need to scrutinize surrounding circumstances to prevent tax evasion through colourable devices. The revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, highlighting the importance of upholding the authenticity of transactions to deter tax avoidance practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>