<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 460 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117938</link>
    <description>The tribunal determined that the diving equipment welded onto the barge should be classified as ship stores, exempt from customs duty. The confiscation of the barge and imposition of duty and penalties were deemed unsustainable. The Commissioner&#039;s order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:55:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 460 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117938</link>
      <description>The tribunal determined that the diving equipment welded onto the barge should be classified as ship stores, exempt from customs duty. The confiscation of the barge and imposition of duty and penalties were deemed unsustainable. The Commissioner&#039;s order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>