https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117919 The Tribunal found that the Assistant Commissioner violated a stay order by adjusting the duty amount from the appellant's refund claim. Coercive recovery during the appeal period was deemed impermissible, and the amount wrongly recovered was ordered to be restored to the appellant within 15 days. The judgment emphasized the need to respect stay orders, refrain from coercive recovery during appeals, and ensure the return of wrongfully recovered amounts to uphold principles of natural justice and procedural fairness in tax matters. Compliance reporting to the Tribunal was mandated to monitor the restoration process. en-us Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:35:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117919 The Tribunal found that the Assistant Commissioner violated a stay order by adjusting the duty amount from the appellant's refund claim. Coercive recovery during the appeal period was deemed impermissible, and the amount wrongly recovered was ordered to be restored to the appellant within 15 days. The judgment emphasized the need to respect stay orders, refrain from coercive recovery during appeals, and ensure the return of wrongfully recovered amounts to uphold principles of natural justice and procedural fairness in tax matters. Compliance reporting to the Tribunal was mandated to monitor the restoration process. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117919