<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 441 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117912</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving duty demand on hydrogen gas clearance. The Tribunal rejected the appeal by the Commissioner of Customs &amp;amp; Central Excise, Indore, challenging the setting aside of demand and penalties. It emphasized the significance of factual verification over statements, supporting the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision based on international formula and cylinder pressure readings. The judgment highlighted discrepancies between the company officer&#039;s admissions and actual verification, ultimately confirming the impugned order and dismissing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:20:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 441 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117912</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving duty demand on hydrogen gas clearance. The Tribunal rejected the appeal by the Commissioner of Customs &amp;amp; Central Excise, Indore, challenging the setting aside of demand and penalties. It emphasized the significance of factual verification over statements, supporting the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision based on international formula and cylinder pressure readings. The judgment highlighted discrepancies between the company officer&#039;s admissions and actual verification, ultimately confirming the impugned order and dismissing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>