<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 440 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117885</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s action of issuing a Detention Order for attachment of plant &amp;amp; machinery and detaining goods before hearing the stay petition to be unjustified. Despite a partial payment made by the appellant towards the penalty, the Tribunal directed the Revenue to lift the detention order immediately and refrain from coercive actions until the stay application is resolved. This decision emphasizes the importance of authorities acting reasonably and proportionately, balancing the rights of the Department with those of the appellant, and upholding principles of fairness and due process in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:10:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 440 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117885</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s action of issuing a Detention Order for attachment of plant &amp;amp; machinery and detaining goods before hearing the stay petition to be unjustified. Despite a partial payment made by the appellant towards the penalty, the Tribunal directed the Revenue to lift the detention order immediately and refrain from coercive actions until the stay application is resolved. This decision emphasizes the importance of authorities acting reasonably and proportionately, balancing the rights of the Department with those of the appellant, and upholding principles of fairness and due process in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>