<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 569 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117865</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on multiple grounds. It allowed the inclusion of Modvat credit in closing stock valuation, referencing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Indo Nippon Chemicals. The issue of net interest concept under Sec. 80HHC was remanded for reconsideration. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding Modvat credit deletion, and it set aside the CIT&#039;s order under Sec. 263, acknowledging the bona fide change in accounting policy as consistent and accepted by the Revenue in subsequent years. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions resulted in favorable outcomes for the assessee on all contested issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 18:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 569 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117865</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on multiple grounds. It allowed the inclusion of Modvat credit in closing stock valuation, referencing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Indo Nippon Chemicals. The issue of net interest concept under Sec. 80HHC was remanded for reconsideration. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding Modvat credit deletion, and it set aside the CIT&#039;s order under Sec. 263, acknowledging the bona fide change in accounting policy as consistent and accepted by the Revenue in subsequent years. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions resulted in favorable outcomes for the assessee on all contested issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>