<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 566 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117856</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees, determining that the interest on retiral benefits should be taxed on an accrual basis from year to year, rather than entirely in the year of receipt. The adjustments made under Section 143(1)(a) were considered beyond the scope of prima facie adjustments, and the interest under Section 234B was to be recalculated based on the revised taxable income, including interest on an accrual basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 566 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117856</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees, determining that the interest on retiral benefits should be taxed on an accrual basis from year to year, rather than entirely in the year of receipt. The adjustments made under Section 143(1)(a) were considered beyond the scope of prima facie adjustments, and the interest under Section 234B was to be recalculated based on the revised taxable income, including interest on an accrual basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>