<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 231 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117853</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the imposition of anti-dumping duty, dismissing the importer&#039;s appeal. The tribunal found the appeal maintainable under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, as the importer participated in the investigation and was affected by the duty. It rejected challenges to the basis of duty imposition, technical/commercial substitutability of imports, and injury to the domestic industry. The tribunal agreed with the authority&#039;s findings and reasoning, concluding that the appellant&#039;s arguments were unfounded. The final order upheld the anti-dumping duty notification, denying relief to the importer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:52:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 231 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117853</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the imposition of anti-dumping duty, dismissing the importer&#039;s appeal. The tribunal found the appeal maintainable under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, as the importer participated in the investigation and was affected by the duty. It rejected challenges to the basis of duty imposition, technical/commercial substitutability of imports, and injury to the domestic industry. The tribunal agreed with the authority&#039;s findings and reasoning, concluding that the appellant&#039;s arguments were unfounded. The final order upheld the anti-dumping duty notification, denying relief to the importer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>