https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117849 The CESTAT treated non-implementation of its earlier direction as unacceptable and used Rule 41 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules to secure compliance with that order. It required the departmental officers to give effect to the direction for clearance of the goods without fine and penalty and to file a compliance report by the specified date. The Tribunal also noted that continued non-compliance could expose the matter to contempt action, reflecting the need for judicial discipline and obedience to Tribunal orders. en-us Tue, 30 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117849 The CESTAT treated non-implementation of its earlier direction as unacceptable and used Rule 41 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules to secure compliance with that order. It required the departmental officers to give effect to the direction for clearance of the goods without fine and penalty and to file a compliance report by the specified date. The Tribunal also noted that continued non-compliance could expose the matter to contempt action, reflecting the need for judicial discipline and obedience to Tribunal orders. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 30 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117849