<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 220 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117847</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ordered the release of seized gold bars, but the Revenue failed to comply, prompting contemplation of shutting down the Tribunal due to non-compliance. Contempt proceedings were initiated against the Commissioner for not releasing the gold, with directions for compliance and potential actions against responsible officers. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of respecting its orders, enforcing legal procedures, and ensuring government officers&#039; accountability. Failure to return the gold was deemed gross misconduct, with warnings of contempt actions and repercussions in officers&#039; performance evaluations for dereliction of duty. Compliance deadline set with High Court referral threat for non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:27:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 220 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117847</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ordered the release of seized gold bars, but the Revenue failed to comply, prompting contemplation of shutting down the Tribunal due to non-compliance. Contempt proceedings were initiated against the Commissioner for not releasing the gold, with directions for compliance and potential actions against responsible officers. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of respecting its orders, enforcing legal procedures, and ensuring government officers&#039; accountability. Failure to return the gold was deemed gross misconduct, with warnings of contempt actions and repercussions in officers&#039; performance evaluations for dereliction of duty. Compliance deadline set with High Court referral threat for non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>