<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 219 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117845</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI dismissed the appeal concerning the classification of a &quot;Scientific Filter Test Unit&quot; imported by a manufacturer of Master Batches. The dispute centered on whether the item should be classified under Heading No. 9026.8 or 9031 for duty purposes. The Tribunal analyzed the item&#039;s technical details and functionality, concluding that it fell under Heading 9031 as a measuring or checking instrument not specified elsewhere. The decision was based on the machine&#039;s design and purpose, as described in the Technical Literature, which indicated its use for testing additives in the manufacturing process rather than measuring liquids or gases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:26:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 219 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117845</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI dismissed the appeal concerning the classification of a &quot;Scientific Filter Test Unit&quot; imported by a manufacturer of Master Batches. The dispute centered on whether the item should be classified under Heading No. 9026.8 or 9031 for duty purposes. The Tribunal analyzed the item&#039;s technical details and functionality, concluding that it fell under Heading 9031 as a measuring or checking instrument not specified elsewhere. The decision was based on the machine&#039;s design and purpose, as described in the Technical Literature, which indicated its use for testing additives in the manufacturing process rather than measuring liquids or gases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>