<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 218 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117842</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of anti-dumping duty on Sodium Hydroxide imported from Chinese Taipei, Indonesia, and the European Union (excluding France), rejecting the appeals made by the importers. The Tribunal found that the importers failed to show compliance with Anti-Dumping Rules, accepted the determination of normal value based on reliable sources, confirmed the causal link between dumping and injury to the domestic industry, upheld the treatment of Chlorine as a by-product, and dismissed concerns regarding non-disclosure of import data sources.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:10:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 218 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117842</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of anti-dumping duty on Sodium Hydroxide imported from Chinese Taipei, Indonesia, and the European Union (excluding France), rejecting the appeals made by the importers. The Tribunal found that the importers failed to show compliance with Anti-Dumping Rules, accepted the determination of normal value based on reliable sources, confirmed the causal link between dumping and injury to the domestic industry, upheld the treatment of Chlorine as a by-product, and dismissed concerns regarding non-disclosure of import data sources.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>