<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 542 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117840</link>
    <description>The ITAT restored the appeals and cross objections to the Assessing Officer to verify if the expenses claimed by the assessee were actual liabilities and to compute house property income accordingly. The tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross objections for statistical purposes, requiring further factual determination by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 13:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 542 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117840</link>
      <description>The ITAT restored the appeals and cross objections to the Assessing Officer to verify if the expenses claimed by the assessee were actual liabilities and to compute house property income accordingly. The tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross objections for statistical purposes, requiring further factual determination by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>