<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 215 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117836</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision to impose a penalty and redemption fine on the importer for misclassifying imported goods and making a false exemption claim under Notification No. 21/2002. The judge found the importer&#039;s actions to be mala fide, leading to the correct imposition of penalties. Although the redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 25,000, the appeal was ultimately rejected with the modified redemption fine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:49:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 215 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117836</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision to impose a penalty and redemption fine on the importer for misclassifying imported goods and making a false exemption claim under Notification No. 21/2002. The judge found the importer&#039;s actions to be mala fide, leading to the correct imposition of penalties. Although the redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 25,000, the appeal was ultimately rejected with the modified redemption fine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>