https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117818 The Court upheld the Order-in-Appeal, dismissing both appeals against the absolute confiscation of goods and penalties imposed on the appellants. The decision was based on conclusive statements from witnesses, lack of credible documentation supporting the appellants' claims of legal possession, and unexplained discrepancies in the case. The Court found the appellants' justifications implausible and noted their failure to provide satisfactory explanations for the discrepancies and unaccounted balance quantity of the seized goods. en-us Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:57:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117818 The Court upheld the Order-in-Appeal, dismissing both appeals against the absolute confiscation of goods and penalties imposed on the appellants. The decision was based on conclusive statements from witnesses, lack of credible documentation supporting the appellants' claims of legal possession, and unexplained discrepancies in the case. The Court found the appellants' justifications implausible and noted their failure to provide satisfactory explanations for the discrepancies and unaccounted balance quantity of the seized goods. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117818