<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 463 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117811</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellants to deposit 50% of the demanded duty within eight weeks, with the balance waived upon this deposit. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reconsideration, setting aside the impugned order. The Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to decide the appeals afresh on merits after the specified pre-deposit is made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:40:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 463 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117811</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellants to deposit 50% of the demanded duty within eight weeks, with the balance waived upon this deposit. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reconsideration, setting aside the impugned order. The Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to decide the appeals afresh on merits after the specified pre-deposit is made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>