https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117803 In a job-work dispute involving man-made fabrics, the Tribunal treated Rule 57AC as materially identical to erstwhile Rule 57F(4) and noted that the procedure under Notification No. 214/86-C.E. followed the same framework. Although exemption under the notification had been denied on the ground that the goods were not covered by the specified final products, the Tribunal found that the appellant had established a prima facie case for interim protection. Unconditional stay was therefore granted in favour of the appellant. en-us Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:18:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117803 In a job-work dispute involving man-made fabrics, the Tribunal treated Rule 57AC as materially identical to erstwhile Rule 57F(4) and noted that the procedure under Notification No. 214/86-C.E. followed the same framework. Although exemption under the notification had been denied on the ground that the goods were not covered by the specified final products, the Tribunal found that the appellant had established a prima facie case for interim protection. Unconditional stay was therefore granted in favour of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117803