<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 456 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117796</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of anti-dumping duty on Float Glass from China and Indonesia, dismissing the appellants&#039; challenges regarding import data accuracy, disclosure statements, injury determination, and retrospective duty levy. The Designated Authority&#039;s decision was supported by evidence from exporters and the domestic industry, demonstrating injury caused by dumped imports through price undercutting and underselling. The Tribunal found no flaws in the Authority&#039;s findings, emphasizing the appellants&#039; failure to provide contrary evidence and affirming the validity of the anti-dumping duty notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:07:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 456 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117796</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of anti-dumping duty on Float Glass from China and Indonesia, dismissing the appellants&#039; challenges regarding import data accuracy, disclosure statements, injury determination, and retrospective duty levy. The Designated Authority&#039;s decision was supported by evidence from exporters and the domestic industry, demonstrating injury caused by dumped imports through price undercutting and underselling. The Tribunal found no flaws in the Authority&#039;s findings, emphasizing the appellants&#039; failure to provide contrary evidence and affirming the validity of the anti-dumping duty notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>