<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 443 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117780</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s appeals, emphasizing that all imported goods are generally liable to duty unless exempted under Section 25 of the Customs Act. The decision classified the goods correctly under the Customs Tariff Act for duty assessment purposes, setting aside the impugned orders and allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:01:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 443 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117780</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s appeals, emphasizing that all imported goods are generally liable to duty unless exempted under Section 25 of the Customs Act. The decision classified the goods correctly under the Customs Tariff Act for duty assessment purposes, setting aside the impugned orders and allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>