<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 437 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117770</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the demands were time-barred due to the Department&#039;s prior knowledge of the conversion activity and the absence of suppression of facts. The inclusion of conversion charges in the assessable value was deemed unjustified, leading to the allowance of the appeal solely on the basis of the time bar issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:51:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 437 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117770</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the demands were time-barred due to the Department&#039;s prior knowledge of the conversion activity and the absence of suppression of facts. The inclusion of conversion charges in the assessable value was deemed unjustified, leading to the allowance of the appeal solely on the basis of the time bar issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>