<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 435 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117767</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the confiscation of goods, penalty, and redemption fine imposed under the Customs Act, 1962. It was found that the excess reels were inadvertently supplied by the foreign supplier, and the goods qualified for exemption under a specific notification due to the appellant&#039;s 100% E.O.U. status. The Tribunal determined no mala fide intent and granted relief, deeming the penalties unwarranted. The appeal was allowed on 10-3-2006, providing a favorable outcome to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:44:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 435 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117767</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the confiscation of goods, penalty, and redemption fine imposed under the Customs Act, 1962. It was found that the excess reels were inadvertently supplied by the foreign supplier, and the goods qualified for exemption under a specific notification due to the appellant&#039;s 100% E.O.U. status. The Tribunal determined no mala fide intent and granted relief, deeming the penalties unwarranted. The appeal was allowed on 10-3-2006, providing a favorable outcome to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>