<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 625 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117758</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the appellant could claim a deduction for interest paid on borrowed funds for investment in a partnership firm against the remuneration received from the firm, assessed under the head &#039;business.&#039; The Tribunal emphasized the differentiation in taxation between firms and partners, allowing deductions for payments such as salary to working partners as per the partnership deed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:17:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 625 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117758</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the appellant could claim a deduction for interest paid on borrowed funds for investment in a partnership firm against the remuneration received from the firm, assessed under the head &#039;business.&#039; The Tribunal emphasized the differentiation in taxation between firms and partners, allowing deductions for payments such as salary to working partners as per the partnership deed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>