https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117750 A prima facie case was found on the computation of the six-month period under Rule 57G(5), with the expression capable of meaning that time runs from the date of issue of the document; the appellate authority had not examined that computation, so interim protection was warranted. On the bills of entry, the photocopies indicated that the documents were not endorsed in favour of the appellant's Bhopal unit as required by the departmental circular, but this did not displace the need to consider interim relief. Balance of convenience supported conditional protection pending appeal, and stay was granted subject to deposit of Rs. 1 lakh and waiver of the balance pre-deposit on compliance. en-us Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:17:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117750 A prima facie case was found on the computation of the six-month period under Rule 57G(5), with the expression capable of meaning that time runs from the date of issue of the document; the appellate authority had not examined that computation, so interim protection was warranted. On the bills of entry, the photocopies indicated that the documents were not endorsed in favour of the appellant's Bhopal unit as required by the departmental circular, but this did not displace the need to consider interim relief. Balance of convenience supported conditional protection pending appeal, and stay was granted subject to deposit of Rs. 1 lakh and waiver of the balance pre-deposit on compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117750