<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 416 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117741</link>
    <description>The marking &quot;marketed by Mother Dairy&quot; on package drinking water labels was treated as a marketing description, not a brand-name use that would defeat small-scale exemption. The label indicated that Mother Dairy acted only as marketing agent, and the expression did not identify the goods in the market as a distinct branded product. Even if Mother Dairy were regarded as a brand name, it referred to a wider basket of products rather than the specific drinking water product. On that basis, the label did not amount to use of a brand name for exemption purposes, and the assessee remained eligible for the small-scale exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:53:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 416 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117741</link>
      <description>The marking &quot;marketed by Mother Dairy&quot; on package drinking water labels was treated as a marketing description, not a brand-name use that would defeat small-scale exemption. The label indicated that Mother Dairy acted only as marketing agent, and the expression did not identify the goods in the market as a distinct branded product. Even if Mother Dairy were regarded as a brand name, it referred to a wider basket of products rather than the specific drinking water product. On that basis, the label did not amount to use of a brand name for exemption purposes, and the assessee remained eligible for the small-scale exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>