https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117736 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalty imposed on the respondents for clearing ink for marker pens without paying duty under notification 83/90. It emphasized the need for proper classification of the ink under CET sub-heading 3215.90 before imposing duty, ordering the original authority to conduct tests to determine the nature of the product. The decision underscored the importance of notifying the assessee of any proposed classification changes before confirming a duty demand, ultimately remanding the case for further assessment. en-us Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:44:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117736 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalty imposed on the respondents for clearing ink for marker pens without paying duty under notification 83/90. It emphasized the need for proper classification of the ink under CET sub-heading 3215.90 before imposing duty, ordering the original authority to conduct tests to determine the nature of the product. The decision underscored the importance of notifying the assessee of any proposed classification changes before confirming a duty demand, ultimately remanding the case for further assessment. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117736