<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 406 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117727</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai due to the appellants&#039; absence. The adjustment of Rs. 2,63,000 towards dues of the same appellants in another case was upheld under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act. Additionally, the appeal was dismissed concerning the interest amount on unutilized credit, as there is no provision for payment of interest on unutilized deemed credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:16:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 406 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117727</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai due to the appellants&#039; absence. The adjustment of Rs. 2,63,000 towards dues of the same appellants in another case was upheld under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act. Additionally, the appeal was dismissed concerning the interest amount on unutilized credit, as there is no provision for payment of interest on unutilized deemed credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>