<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 430 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117707</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs and capital goods was held allowable where the final products had in fact suffered duty, including clearances for domestic sale and export; credit could not be denied merely because exemption was available or could have been chosen. The extended period of limitation was also held inapplicable because the assessee had disclosed the relevant activities through declarations and monthly returns, and there was no suppression or concealment. On that basis, the demand and penalties were set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 430 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117707</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs and capital goods was held allowable where the final products had in fact suffered duty, including clearances for domestic sale and export; credit could not be denied merely because exemption was available or could have been chosen. The extended period of limitation was also held inapplicable because the assessee had disclosed the relevant activities through declarations and monthly returns, and there was no suppression or concealment. On that basis, the demand and penalties were set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>