<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 429 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117705</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi rectified a typographical error in a stay order, accepting the Revenue&#039;s application to correct a demand amount. The dispute arose from the waiver of duty pre-deposit, with the Revenue claiming control over the goods while the applicant argued they only had custody. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s contention, disposing of the rectification application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:56:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 429 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117705</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi rectified a typographical error in a stay order, accepting the Revenue&#039;s application to correct a demand amount. The dispute arose from the waiver of duty pre-deposit, with the Revenue claiming control over the goods while the applicant argued they only had custody. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s contention, disposing of the rectification application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>