<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 424 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117698</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the applicant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty in a case concerning the assessable value of bulk drugs cleared to another unit. The dispute centered on the method of determining the cost of production, with the revenue&#039;s approach of considering the selling price of the final product being challenged by the applicant. The Tribunal sided with the applicant, emphasizing the discrepancy in value addition percentages and ruling that the revenue&#039;s calculation did not align with the Valuation Rules. As a result, the pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived, and the case was scheduled for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:36:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 424 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117698</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the applicant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty in a case concerning the assessable value of bulk drugs cleared to another unit. The dispute centered on the method of determining the cost of production, with the revenue&#039;s approach of considering the selling price of the final product being challenged by the applicant. The Tribunal sided with the applicant, emphasizing the discrepancy in value addition percentages and ruling that the revenue&#039;s calculation did not align with the Valuation Rules. As a result, the pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived, and the case was scheduled for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>