<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 591 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117675</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially ruled in favor of the assessees by allowing the deletion of the perquisite value of food and interest under section 234B. However, the Tribunal rejected the grounds related to relief under the Agreement for Avoidance of Double Taxation (AADT) and the taxability of salary received outside India, citing previous judgments and decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:31:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 591 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117675</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially ruled in favor of the assessees by allowing the deletion of the perquisite value of food and interest under section 234B. However, the Tribunal rejected the grounds related to relief under the Agreement for Avoidance of Double Taxation (AADT) and the taxability of salary received outside India, citing previous judgments and decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>