<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 407 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117671</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the abatement of loading charges at the depot from the assessable value of goods. The Tribunal determined that loading charges at the depot should not be deducted from the assessable value due to a shift in the place of removal post an amendment in 1996. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the previous order-in-appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:13:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 407 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117671</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the abatement of loading charges at the depot from the assessable value of goods. The Tribunal determined that loading charges at the depot should not be deducted from the assessable value due to a shift in the place of removal post an amendment in 1996. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the previous order-in-appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>