<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 424 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117648</link>
    <description>Special Additional Duty was held not leviable on re-imported goods where the importer had reversed the export benefit and drawback and satisfied the conditions of the re-import exemption notifications. The duty structure treated the additional levy as connected to the basic customs duty and excise duty otherwise payable on re-import; once those underlying duties stood exempted under the notification, the connected Special Additional Duty could not be demanded independently. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 424 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117648</link>
      <description>Special Additional Duty was held not leviable on re-imported goods where the importer had reversed the export benefit and drawback and satisfied the conditions of the re-import exemption notifications. The duty structure treated the additional levy as connected to the basic customs duty and excise duty otherwise payable on re-import; once those underlying duties stood exempted under the notification, the connected Special Additional Duty could not be demanded independently. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>