<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 421 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117642</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on furnace oil depended on proof of actual duty payment on the inputs. Where the invoices reflected an inflated duty amount because the supplier had miscalculated duty, the Department could restrict credit to the correct duty actually payable. On these facts, the assessee had no basis to claim any additional credit beyond the amount recalculated and allowed by the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:07:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 421 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117642</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on furnace oil depended on proof of actual duty payment on the inputs. Where the invoices reflected an inflated duty amount because the supplier had miscalculated duty, the Department could restrict credit to the correct duty actually payable. On these facts, the assessee had no basis to claim any additional credit beyond the amount recalculated and allowed by the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>