<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 412 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117631</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all three appeals, overturning the confiscation of goods and truck, as well as the penalties imposed on the involved parties. The judgment emphasized the necessity of proving an actual attempt to export goods to constitute an offense under the Customs Act, rather than relying solely on intention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:40:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 412 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117631</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all three appeals, overturning the confiscation of goods and truck, as well as the penalties imposed on the involved parties. The judgment emphasized the necessity of proving an actual attempt to export goods to constitute an offense under the Customs Act, rather than relying solely on intention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>