<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 745 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117615</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to allow the assessee&#039;s claim for bad debts amounting to Rs. 13,23,598 under section 36(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal held that the write-off of the debt was justified as it was a prudent business decision after all recovery efforts failed, in compliance with the legislative intent behind the amendment to section 36(1)(vii).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:50:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 745 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117615</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to allow the assessee&#039;s claim for bad debts amounting to Rs. 13,23,598 under section 36(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal held that the write-off of the debt was justified as it was a prudent business decision after all recovery efforts failed, in compliance with the legislative intent behind the amendment to section 36(1)(vii).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>