<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 414 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117609</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Original authority&#039;s decision in favor of the Revenue, ruling that the appropriation of the refund amount towards pending arrears was lawful as there were no stay orders against the relevant order-in-appeal at the time. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in setting aside the appropriation, and the Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, emphasizing that the Original authority had acted in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:31:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 414 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117609</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Original authority&#039;s decision in favor of the Revenue, ruling that the appropriation of the refund amount towards pending arrears was lawful as there were no stay orders against the relevant order-in-appeal at the time. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in setting aside the appropriation, and the Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, emphasizing that the Original authority had acted in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>