<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 537 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117590</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the manufacturers&#039; claim for duty exemption under Section 20(1)(d) of the Customs Act, upholding the duty payment demand on re-imported goods exported under an Excise bond. Relying on a previous Apex Court decision, the Tribunal emphasized the obligation to pay duty on re-imported goods at the applicable rate. The Tribunal allowed the manufacturers to pursue their claim for duty drawback separately while setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and ruling in favor of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:21:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 537 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117590</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the manufacturers&#039; claim for duty exemption under Section 20(1)(d) of the Customs Act, upholding the duty payment demand on re-imported goods exported under an Excise bond. Relying on a previous Apex Court decision, the Tribunal emphasized the obligation to pay duty on re-imported goods at the applicable rate. The Tribunal allowed the manufacturers to pursue their claim for duty drawback separately while setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and ruling in favor of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>