<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 558 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117588</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai addressed the denial of Modvat credit for capital goods and the dispute over depreciation figures in revised income tax returns. The Tribunal remanded the matter for further examination to ensure a fair determination, emphasizing the importance of proper verification and consideration of evidence for a just outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:01:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 558 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117588</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai addressed the denial of Modvat credit for capital goods and the dispute over depreciation figures in revised income tax returns. The Tribunal remanded the matter for further examination to ensure a fair determination, emphasizing the importance of proper verification and consideration of evidence for a just outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>