<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 212 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117583</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for restoration of the appeal due to the applicants&#039; persistent non-compliance with the pre-deposit order. Despite multiple opportunities and previous rejections of similar applications, the applicants failed to deposit the required amount. The attachment of the property by various departments did not meet the Tribunal&#039;s requirements, resulting in the rejection of the miscellaneous application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:55:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 212 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117583</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for restoration of the appeal due to the applicants&#039; persistent non-compliance with the pre-deposit order. Despite multiple opportunities and previous rejections of similar applications, the applicants failed to deposit the required amount. The attachment of the property by various departments did not meet the Tribunal&#039;s requirements, resulting in the rejection of the miscellaneous application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>