<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 210 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117581</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals, determining that Customs authorities lacked jurisdiction to demand duty or impose penalties regarding DEPB credit granted by the DGFT. It affirmed that the DGFT exclusively determines and modifies DEPB credit. The Tribunal criticized contradictory government actions, highlighting potential confusion for exporters. Appeals were allowed with consequential relief, deeming any Customs action in pending DGFT cases premature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 210 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117581</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals, determining that Customs authorities lacked jurisdiction to demand duty or impose penalties regarding DEPB credit granted by the DGFT. It affirmed that the DGFT exclusively determines and modifies DEPB credit. The Tribunal criticized contradictory government actions, highlighting potential confusion for exporters. Appeals were allowed with consequential relief, deeming any Customs action in pending DGFT cases premature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>